Master VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam with Reliable Practice Questions

Correct : D

In VMware's design methodology, as outlined in the VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide, requirements are categorized into Business Requirements (high-level organizational goals) and Technical Requirements (specific system capabilities or constraints to achieve those goals). Technical Requirements bridge the gap between what the business wants and how the solution delivers it. Let's evaluate each option:

Option A: Technical requirements define which goals and objectives can be achieved

This suggests Technical Requirements determine feasibility, which aligns more with a scoping or assessment phase, not their purpose. VMware documentation positions Technical Requirements as implementation-focused, not evaluative.

Option B: Technical requirements define what goals and objectives need to be achieved

This describes Business Requirements, which outline ''what'' the organization aims to accomplish (e.g., reduce costs, improve uptime). Technical Requirements specify ''how'' these are realized, making this incorrect.

Option C: Technical requirements define which audience needs to be involved

Audience involvement relates to stakeholder identification, not Technical Requirements. The VCF 5.2 Design Guide ties Technical Requirements to system functionality, not personnel.

Option D: Technical requirements define how the goals and objectives can be achieved

This is correct. Technical Requirements detail the system's capabilities, constraints, and configurations (e.g., ''support 10,000 users,'' ''use AES-256 encryption'') to meet business goals. The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide defines them as the ''how''---specific, measurable criteria enabling the solution's implementation.

Conclusion:

Option D accurately reflects the purpose of Technical Requirements in VCF 5.2, focusing on the means to achieve business objectives.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide (docs.vmware.com): Section on Requirements Classification.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guide (docs.vmware.com): Business vs. Technical Requirements.

Correct : D

The task involves adding four vSAN ESA (Express Storage Architecture) ready nodes to an existing VCF 5.2 deployment for application workloads. The current setup includes a vSAN-based Management Domain and a workload domain (A) using iSCSI storage. In VCF, workload domains are logical units with consistent storage and lifecycle management via vSphere Lifecycle Manager (vLCM). Let's analyze each option:

Option A: Commission the four new nodes into the existing workload domain A cluster

Workload domain A uses iSCSI storage, while the new nodes are vSAN ESA ready. VCF 5.2 doesn't support mixing principal storage types (e.g., iSCSI and vSAN) within a single cluster, as per the VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide. Commissioning vSAN nodes into an iSCSI cluster would require converting the entire cluster to vSAN, which isn't feasible with existing workloads and violates storage consistency, making this impractical.

Option B: Create a new vLCM image workload domain with the four new nodes

This phrasing is ambiguous. vLCM manages ESXi images and baselines, but ''vLCM image workload domain'' isn't a standard VCF term. It might imply a new workload domain with a custom vLCM image, but lacks clarity compared to standard options (C, D). The VCF 5.2 Administration Guide uses ''baseline'' or ''image-based'' distinctly, so this is less precise.

Option C: Create a new vLCM baseline cluster in the existing workload domain with the four new nodes

Adding a new cluster to an existing workload domain is possible in VCF, but clusters within a domain must share the same principal storage (iSCSI in workload domain A). The VCF 5.2 Administration Guide states that vSAN ESA requires a dedicated cluster and can't coexist with iSCSI in the same domain configuration, rendering this option invalid.

Option D: Create a new vLCM baseline workload domain with the four new nodes

A new workload domain with vSAN ESA as the principal storage aligns with VCF 5.2 design principles. vLCM baselines ensure consistent ESXi versioning and firmware for the new nodes. The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide recommends separate workload domains for different storage types or workload purposes (e.g., application capacity). This leverages the vSAN ESA nodes effectively, isolates them from the iSCSI-based domain A, and supports application workloads seamlessly.

Conclusion:

Option D is the best recommendation, creating a new vSAN ESA-based workload domain managed by vLCM, meeting capacity needs while adhering to VCF 5.2 storage and domain consistency rules.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide (docs.vmware.com): Workload Domain Design and vSAN ESA.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide (docs.vmware.com): vLCM and Cluster Expansion.

vSAN ESA Planning and Deployment Guide (docs.vmware.com): Storage Requirements.

Correct : C

In VCF 5.2, the logical design focuses on high-level architectural decisions that define the system's structure and behavior, as opposed to physical or operational details. Networking decisions in the logical design emphasize scalability, security policies, and connectivity frameworks, per the VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide. Let's evaluate each:

Option A: Use of 2x 64-port Cisco Nexus 9300 for top-of-rack ESXi host switches

This specifies physical hardware, a detail typically documented in the physical design (e.g., BOM, rack layout). The VCF 5.2 Design Guide distinguishes hardware choices as physical, not logical, unless they dictate architecture (e.g., spine-leaf), which isn't implied here.

Option B: NSX Distributed Firewall (DFW) rule to block all traffic by default

This is a security policy configuration within NSX, defining how traffic is controlled. While critical, it's an operational or detailed design decision (e.g., rule set), not a high-level logical design element. The VCF 5.2 Networking Guide places DFW rules in implementation details, not the logical overview.

Option C: Implement overlay network technology to scale across data centers

Overlay networking (e.g., NSX VXLAN or Geneve) is a foundational architectural decision in VCF, enabling scalability, multi-site connectivity, and logical separation of networks. The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide highlights overlays as a core logical design component, directly impacting how the solution scales across data centers, making it a prime candidate for the logical design.

Option D: Configure Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) - Listen mode on all Distributed Virtual Switches (DVS)

CDP in Listen mode aids network discovery and troubleshooting on DVS. This is a configuration setting, not a logical design decision. The VCF 5.2 Networking Guide treats such protocol settings as operational details, not architectural choices.

Conclusion:

Option C belongs in the logical design, as it defines a scalable networking architecture critical to VCF 5.2's multi-data center capabilities.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide (docs.vmware.com): Logical Design and Overlay Networking.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Networking Guide (docs.vmware.com): NSX and DVS Configuration.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guide (docs.vmware.com): Logical vs. Physical Design.

Correct : D

The customer requires Kubernetes-based application deployment within a new VCF 5.2 instance without additional licensing costs. VCF includes foundational components and optional features, some requiring separate licenses. Let's evaluate each option:

Option A: Tanzu Mission Control

Tanzu Mission Control (TMC) is a centralized management platform for Kubernetes clusters across environments. It's a SaaS offering requiring a separate subscription, not included in the base VCF license. The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide excludes TMC from standard VCF features, making it incompatible with the no-budget constraint.

Option B: VCF Edge

VCF Edge refers to edge computing deployments (e.g., remote sites) using lightweight VCF instances. It's not a Kubernetes-specific feature and doesn't inherently provide Kubernetes capabilities without additional configuration or licensing (e.g., Tanzu). The VCF 5.2 Administration Guide positions VCF Edge as an architecture, not a Kubernetes solution.

Option C: Aria Automation

Aria Automation (formerly vRealize Automation) provides cloud management and orchestration, including some Kubernetes integration via Tanzu Service Mesh or custom workflows. However, it's an optional component in VCF, often requiring additional licensing beyond the base VCF bundle, per the VCF 5.2 Licensing Guide. It's not mandatory for basic Kubernetes and violates the budget restriction.

Option D: IaaS control plane

In VCF 5.2, the IaaS control plane includes VMware Cloud Director or the native vSphere with Tanzu capability (via NSX and vSphere 7.x). vSphere with Tanzu, enabled through the Workload Management feature, provides a Supervisor Cluster for Kubernetes without additional licensing beyond VCF's core components (vSphere, vSAN, NSX). The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide confirms that vSphere with Tanzu is included in VCF editions supporting NSX, allowing Kubernetes-based application deployment (e.g., Tanzu Kubernetes Grid clusters) at no extra cost.

Conclusion:

The IaaS control plane (D), leveraging vSphere with Tanzu, meets the requirement for Kubernetes deployment within VCF 5.2's existing licensing, satisfying the no-budget constraint.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide (docs.vmware.com): IaaS Control Plane and vSphere with Tanzu.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide (docs.vmware.com): Workload Management Features.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Licensing Guide (docs.vmware.com): Included Components.

Correct : B

The design focuses on IaaS control plane security for Kubernetes within VCF 5.2, requiring Kubernetes Network Policies, cluster-wide policies, and support for multiple Kubernetes distributions. VMware Container Networking integrates with vSphere with Tanzu (part of VCF's IaaS control plane). Let's evaluate:

Option A: NSX VPCs

NSX VPCs (Virtual Private Clouds) provide isolated network domains in NSX-T, enhancing tenant segmentation. While NSX underpins vSphere with Tanzu networking, NSX VPCs are an advanced feature for workload isolation, not a direct implementation of Kubernetes Network Policies or cluster-wide policies. The VCF 5.2 Networking Guide positions NSX VPCs as optional, not required for core Kubernetes networking.

Option B: Antrea

Antrea is an open-source container network interface (CNI) plugin integrated with vSphere with Tanzu in VCF 5.2. It supports Kubernetes Network Policies (e.g., pod-to-pod rules), cluster-wide policies via Antrea-specific CRDs (Custom Resource Definitions), and multiple Kubernetes distributions (e.g., TKG clusters). The VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide notes Antrea as an alternative CNI to NSX, enabled when NSX isn't used for Kubernetes networking, meeting all requirements with native Kubernetes compatibility and security features.

Option C: Harbor

Harbor is a container registry for storing and securing images, not a networking solution. The VCF 5.2 Administration Guide confirms Harbor's role in image management, not network policy enforcement, making it irrelevant here.

Option D: Velero Operators

Velero is a backup and recovery tool for Kubernetes clusters, not a networking component. The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide lists Velero for disaster recovery, not security or network policies, ruling it out.

Conclusion:

Antrea (B) meets all requirements by providing Kubernetes Network Policies, cluster-wide policy support, and compatibility with multiple Kubernetes distributions, aligning with VCF 5.2's container networking options.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide (docs.vmware.com): Container Networking with Antrea.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Networking Guide (docs.vmware.com): NSX and Antrea in vSphere with Tanzu.

vSphere with Tanzu Configuration Guide (docs.vmware.com): CNI Options.